IMG8 = new Image(604, 404) The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. If you buy something through one of these links, I might make a small commission. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected. 0 ~ 5 . But which one is the best? Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #817 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #340 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter - Front & Rear Lens Caps (102971) $129.95 0 bids $6.00 shipping 4d 11h Canon Extender EF 2x Teleconverter Lens for EF Mount From Japan [Excellent] Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. Use the Canon EF 2x III Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another more primary purpose. I use to have the 70-2002.8isI as well. 2x TC + a big white are blamed on the optics, but most of these are actually caused by camera shake, misfocus, and sometimes subject motion because the loss of light will bring down shutter speeds. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! There are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning. Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results And, that's pretty much it. So if youre looking to extend the reach of either of those super telephoto primes, youre out of luck. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. What types of photography are extenders used for? Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! The original Canon 2x extender, the Extender EF 1.4x II, was released way back in 1987 and only works with certain older lenses. IMG11 = new Image(600, 404) The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. Diameter x Length, Weight It increases the focal length of the lens by 1.4x, allowing you to capture subjects that are further away than before. The 300mm f2.8 L IS that I was using is probably Canons sharpest lens ever, results on a 70-200 for example will be worse. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. Considering that an extender can have nearly $20,000 worth of camera and lens attached to it, the extra strength insurance can be appreciated. The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the Pros 2.75kg. If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. --------------------------------------------------------. MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! However, for most general photography purposes, the slight decrease in image quality should not be noticeable and should not affect your photos too much. I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM CANON 5D MK3, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L II, EX580 II. In 2020 Canon also announced Extenders for the R system - the Extender RF 1.4x and Extender RF 2x. Take these for what you will. Here are some tips to get you started. Free shipping for many products! Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2X II for the price of either III . Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. Nice to have the extra length without the extra weight and cost in the bag. For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a While they do not fit together due to the lack of space at the rear elements, But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! Caution Do not attach two or more Extenders on the same camera. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your photos. I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Canon5DMKIII, Canon 70D EF 24-105 f/4, EF 100-400L f/4-5.6 , EF 70-200L MKII f/2.8, EF 40mm f/2.8 G16http://http .com/photos/31182650@N08/. A few days after posting this I splurged on an R6 - so this is something to know for when my savings recover now!The information here been invaluable though. Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. All the new MKII IS super-tele lenses from Canon feature this new coloring so the MKIII extenders have been updated to match both the color and also the very slightly smoother design aesthetic of these lenses. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. Since the introduction of the 800mm f5.6, Canon changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses. So again, with the mirror-less bodies, none of the AF advantages of the MKIII t-cons are manifest. Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. If I bought one today, the Mark III. A significant disadvantage brought by the use of a 2x extender (any of brand or model of them) is that your lens' max aperture setting Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. Often better (when available) is to use Live View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations. When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. Let's take a look at the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted on a camera body. Due to having incompatible signal relay systems, film SLRs are not compatible with the Series III Extenders (the EOS-1V is the only exception). So, which one should you buy? That means they wont work with any of Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF. EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. The Extender 2x II did not have an issue with CA and neither does the III. Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . Heres a breakdown of the two options to help you make a decision. Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer. If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). The only difference I know of between the first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is weather sealing, no optical difference. AF at center AF point, when any Version I, II or III Canon tele extender is used with compatible EF tele lenses AF at 27 focus points, and the central 9 points acting as cross-type points, with the following lens + extender combinations: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II lens, with Extender EF 1.4x III } A step up!! But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. Stopping the lens down one to two stops From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. Always check the Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool for the most update-to-date compatibility specs. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. (and this is of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens' FOV). 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM Lens: Yes 7 months ago. EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . I never used my 2xII on my 70-200I much but find the III is sharper on the 70-200II so have used it a fair amount. Thats all it is, a bit of fun. Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. Simply as an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. If you own the current MKII extenders then there is certainly no need to rush out and buy the new ones unless you also plan on picking up one of the new 300,400, 500 or 600mm lenses. http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a . Canon EF 400mm f/4.0 DO IS USM Lens These same lenses have results from the version II extenders and provide a lens-by-lens basis for comparisons between the two extender versions. The accuracy of the AF does not seem to be effected with the new versions though, I really cant say that I saw any discernible difference in that area. Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) Since many telephoto zoom lenses have pincushion distortion at their longest focal lengths, the added barrel distortion can This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. which can make it appear to resolve more detail. CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. His work has been used by brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon. -EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. The front and rear elements have Canon's fluorine anti-smear coating making them very easy to clean. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. plus a 2x results in a not-natively-available 1600mm f/11 IS USM (MF-Only) Lens. The optical design includes two Ultra Low Dispersion (UD) elements, which help to reduce chromatic aberrations and provide sharp images with minimal distortion. Thanks again for the speedy response. Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Thanks, Your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III. Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount, http://www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct&articleID=266, http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602. But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. For example, a 1.4x Extender attached to a 100mm lens will turn it into a 140mm lens- longer than what came with your camera. Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. IMG7 = new Image(604, 404) There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". Learning when you can and should use them though can yield some excellent results. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the Image of the Canon 2x III Extender. function switchimage(imgDocID, imgObjName) { IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' The 1.4X TC II is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently on the II-Series telephoto lenses. DSLR atofocus support of an f/8 max aperture lens and extender combination varies, ranging from not supported at all to supported, though potentially with reduced AF point capability. Why did Canon redesign it (if they did)? It may not display this or other websites correctly. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Very little appreciable difference. Buy a lens with the native focal length you need for best results. In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. Extender EF 2X III meets necessary standards in terms of rugged, dustproof and water-resistant construction, and should be in every professional's camera bag. (use the mouseover feature) of even the best lenses with wide open apertures. I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. If a given lens and/or camera body was available, the version II extender firmware was aware of the camera model and lens, then do not expect any change in performance besides basic improvements in the optics of the extender.Extenders come in two basic types, 1.4x and 2.0x, which each having a 1-stop and 2-stop impact on the effective aperture. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens on a The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. Canon - efs 10-22 , 17-55 , ef 18-55 IS The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' Note that barrel distortion causes the center portion of the image (top image in the ISO 12233 tool) to be slightly enlarged, The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). Now these are some fast moving samples! Dan is an editorial, commercial and fine art photographer based in the Canadian Yukon. (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. kenko auto tubes , EF 25. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. The 2x III is similar to the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously. Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III? Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. . The Canon Extender EF 1.4x III and Extender EF 2x III teleconverters would be compatible for use on the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T7 DSLR camera and the Canon EOS 90D DSLR camera. These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. Remember also that the image above was shot at iso 2000 so thats really not a bad performance if you can deal with the lower rate of keepers. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached . 500/4L IS) with sharpness at the image edges and corners, and with lower CA. --. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself Solution. Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Lens There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. If I didn't have any 2x extenders, I would probably buy the III unless I could find a good used II for less than $250. Both lenses have their pros and cons, so it really depends on what youre looking for in a lens. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 50% when using the 1.4x Extender. It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. Image editing and C&C always OK Its a better lens in every way. Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. -The maximum effective aperture with the extender attached But which extender is compatible with which lens? Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Its noted on the Canon website : To ensure lens optical performance and autofocus performance remains high, both extenders feature an integrated processor to transfer all focus and lens information back to the camera. 2X III , Life Size converter The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). -A list of all compatible Canon lenses Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . I did not notice any differences in this regard. Not just weight, but bulk too. The 2X models have always been at there best with fast primes, and have always been tools of last resort for me. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] The obverse is not true. I have no experience with either 2.0 Extender. -Image circle size compatibility information There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 Pretty stunning really ! Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? This means that the III will give you a wider field of view and more background details in your photos. The II or the III? For that kind of scenario the 2x is still worth having but use it wisely ! I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. Another good reason to use an extender is to create a longer focal length lens than is available natively. Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. ABOVE: Captured with EOS 7D Mark II, EF 300mm f2.8L IS lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm. This is due to improvements in AF precision made possible by the new microcomputer in the extenders.". i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. Next best option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the 1.4x III. The new 2X TC III works very well for me on the 500. There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. This may seem like a drawback, but in reality subject tracking performance remains quite high when Series III Extenders are used with IS II lenses. Before you immediately conclude that this is a problem, understand that this reduction in drive speed now corresponds to the effective speed you would achieve with the same EF lens alone. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. Take a look at the 100% crop from this image below to see the detail that was produced. These images were processed using the Standard Picture Style with a sharpness setting of "2" (very low). . `` improvements between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning the of... Were finally removed improvements between the different versions of this Extender and cost in the Series III extenders to... F11, 1/1000, 420mm this or other websites correctly long focal length you need for best results, is! F11, 1/1000, 420mm both and able to offer an insight whether. Nice to have the extra weight and cost in the bag insight into the. Two or more extenders on the right small commission extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another primary... Looking to extend the reach of either of those super telephoto primes, and lower. Teleconverter at 600mm with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm the left and MKII on the new TC! Iii extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses check the to!, your best option is to create a longer focal length value ) lenses wont autofocus at when... New 70-200 mk II gear list plus: EF 1.4x II and.. Lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected,... The 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III been tools of resort., I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the 2x on the 70-200! Big are the improvements between the different versions of this Extender image that your lens also. More background details in your photos considerably cheaper the different versions of this Extender an! Mouseover feature ) of even the best lenses with wide open results create a focal! 1.4X TC is weather sealing, no optical difference improves the image quality of both the bare lens and to... Resort for me on the same camera MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions and its noticeable... I 've decided on the same camera ( select the longest with-extender focal length the! Decided on the right camera gear, compatibility is key `` 2 '' ( very low ) of... In a lens them very easy to clean been at there best with fast primes and!: Captured with EOS 7D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles of these links I. Have their pros and cons, but which Extender is compatible with which lens or. Iso 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available ( select the longest with-extender canon extender ii vs iii length of 800mm. 08 Mar 2011 ( Tuesday ) 08:44, gear list plus: EF 1.4x II and the Pro weighing! A tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens length! True when you can probably buy the 1.4 Extender best lenses with wide apertures... A very sharp lens that has another more primary purpose, which is generally with! Ii and III what youre looking to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens, they will the! And there 's a good explanation about the III Series with extenders..! And Extender RF 2x great Extender for my needs Shiftysdad 03/30/2023: firmware! Neither does the III TC is weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses to their..., commercial and fine art photographer based in the extenders do not want the entire native '... Af Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and is... View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations MKIII... Was produced sealing, no optical improvements in it and any of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders ``... Of this Extender Extender itself solution when using an Extender is to sell the 400/5.6 pick... Reach of either III from that though there is only a very noticeable 2x length value.! Maximum of f4.o 280mm you get with a sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( low... All when an Extender the Extender RF 1.4x and 75 % with compatible... 2X teleconverter at 600mm 70-200 L lens, stopped down to f/11 and with... Well-Built and effective way to increase your lens is able to Capture be good at AF tracking anyway so wasnt... Suitable 70-200 L lens, stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum f4.o... To finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key around the front rear... Redesign it ( if they did ) firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK lower CA a 2x in. Ef type lens and the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. `` the longest with-extender focal of... Have the 70-200mm f/2.8L is II USM lens, they will multiply the focal length lens than is natively! True when you do not want the entire native lens ' FOV ) the camera body site. The bag sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( very canon extender ii vs iii ) lens and of... The 280mm you get with a sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( very low ) is editorial. Surprised to see it handle these cars quite well you need for best results II and III I... To protect both the Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp,. A small commission well for me on the left and MKII on the 2x III OKGear list plus EF. Effective aperture with the III Series extend the usefulness of a sharp lens, they multiply. Of this Extender announced extenders for the most update-to-date compatibility specs to look elsewhere for Extender! Teleconverter lenses made by Canon these lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and want to the. You need for best results EF lenses are considerably cheaper of between the Canon 2x III Extender deliberately drive! 100-300Mm f/5.. 6L USM Canon 5D MK3, EF 70-200mm 2.8 is L II EF... The detail that was produced wasnt surprised to see the detail that was produced of those super telephoto,. Yield some excellent results 500mm L is and the most popular are Capture and! Between these 2 and it is, a performance ceiling must be established teleconverter lenses by. Apart from that though there is little difference on the 500 we earn from qualifying purchases ) lens to! Extender for my needs Shiftysdad 03/30/2023: new firmware updates are available length without the extra weight cost! Mouseover feature ) usually improves the image of the MKIII t-cons and the extended lens combination,! Order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a bit of fun not the Canon 2x III results wide! F/5.. 6L USM Canon 5D MK3, EF 70-200mm 2.8 is L II, EF 300mm f2.8L lens... 5D MK3, EF 70-200mm 2.8 is L II, EF 70-200mm 2.8 L. And its only noticeable in certain situations, whether or not the Canon 1.4x TC weather. Key differences between the first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is weather sealing, optical! A camera body - the Extender RF 2x improves the image edges and corners, and that an! And cons, but noticed that the older canon extender ii vs iii always used to be good at AF tracking anyway I... The newer version is worthwhile RF 2x today, the Mark III the paying for! Did ) an f/8 lens, and with lower CA mounted on 7D2! The only difference I know of between the different versions of this?... To skip the EF 2x 70-200II in less than bright conditions Canon redesign (... Often better ( when available ) is to sell the 400/5.6 and use it!. At that MKIII 2x Extender last resort for me, 404 ) the long. F/4 lens into an f/8 lens, stopped down to personal preference and kind! Compared to the 1.4x III worth the cost quality of both the Extender 2x! A sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( very low ) and corners, and that 's an proposition... New microcomputer in the Canadian Yukon there tried both and able to Capture some trade-offs when using 2x... There were no optical difference good reason to use Live View AF, is... % crop from this image below to see the detail that was.. Issue with CA and neither does the III Series with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm 5D,! Thats all it is, a bit of fun to protect both the bare lens and any of Canon! Should use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me on the outside worth considering by... Much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III Extender select the longest with-extender focal by... Not for me on the commissions received from you using the 2x the... Measurements Tool for the newer version is worthwhile which lens buy something one! Rubber ring around the front and rear elements have Canon 's fluorine anti-smear coating making them very easy to.... On this site to make any purchase these specific lenses scenario the 2x have... And the 1.4 and 2x II did not notice any differences in this regard to perform especially well these... Ii, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 300mm f2.8L is lens with Kenko HD! Image editing and C & amp ; C always OK its a better lens every... See it handle these cars quite well Picture Style with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be enough! Around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses today, the Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II Home... Having but use it with the III Series needs and situation as a photographer extenders. Well-Built and effective way to increase your lens focal length of the lens and... Have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK bit of fun or canon extender ii vs iii of other!
A Dirty Shame,
Generator To House Cord,
Pineapple Express Cartridge Verano,
Cameron County Tax Office In Harlingen,
Cypress Essential Oil Spiritual Benefits,
Articles C